My feedback based on completing programs from both institutions.
ENEBS:
* ENEB's materials are generally more robust, providing comprehensive content for most courses. However, some courses suffer from poorly structured materials, making them difficult to comprehend.
* In the old format, ENEB's programs were stronger due to the inclusion of case studies at the end of each course, which added practical relevance.
* ENEB has a strong business focus, catering to individuals seeking expertise in that area.
* Both ENEB and Masstercursos (MC) now offer only exams, eliminating any advantage for either platform. MC includes final written papers in addition to multiple-choice exams.
* Despite being unaccredited, ENEB and MC have associations with accredited institutions, lending some credibility to their programs.
* Previously, the old ENEB program could have potentially allowed credit transfers, providing additional benefits for learners.
* ENEB has some mixed foreign evaluations, but overall feedback is positive, indicating the quality of their courses.
* ENEB offers financial incentives some moderators openly promote
Masstercursos (MC):
* MC lacks foreign evaluation, but they claim that it should not be an issue. However, further verification may be required before enrolling.
* Similar to ENEB, MC has an exams-only approach, making the two platforms more comparable in terms of assessment.
* Like ENEB, MC is unaccredited but has associations with accredited institutions, providing some level of legitimacy to their programs.
* MC stands out as the most affordable option, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious learners.
* MC specializes in psychology-focused courses, catering to individuals interested in that particular field.
* At present, MC does not offer financial incentives or promotions, but this may change in the future.
* Interestingly, even after translating MC courses using Google Translate, the content remains clear and understandable, which is commendable.
ENEBS:
* ENEB's materials are generally more robust, providing comprehensive content for most courses. However, some courses suffer from poorly structured materials, making them difficult to comprehend.
* In the old format, ENEB's programs were stronger due to the inclusion of case studies at the end of each course, which added practical relevance.
* ENEB has a strong business focus, catering to individuals seeking expertise in that area.
* Both ENEB and Masstercursos (MC) now offer only exams, eliminating any advantage for either platform. MC includes final written papers in addition to multiple-choice exams.
* Despite being unaccredited, ENEB and MC have associations with accredited institutions, lending some credibility to their programs.
* Previously, the old ENEB program could have potentially allowed credit transfers, providing additional benefits for learners.
* ENEB has some mixed foreign evaluations, but overall feedback is positive, indicating the quality of their courses.
* ENEB offers financial incentives some moderators openly promote
Masstercursos (MC):
* MC lacks foreign evaluation, but they claim that it should not be an issue. However, further verification may be required before enrolling.
* Similar to ENEB, MC has an exams-only approach, making the two platforms more comparable in terms of assessment.
* Like ENEB, MC is unaccredited but has associations with accredited institutions, providing some level of legitimacy to their programs.
* MC stands out as the most affordable option, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious learners.
* MC specializes in psychology-focused courses, catering to individuals interested in that particular field.
* At present, MC does not offer financial incentives or promotions, but this may change in the future.
* Interestingly, even after translating MC courses using Google Translate, the content remains clear and understandable, which is commendable.
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)
