06-04-2022, 08:44 AM
(06-04-2022, 07:30 AM)smartdegree Wrote:(06-03-2022, 11:41 PM)mcjon77 Wrote: While I am glad that other options are being created, can someone give me a use case where getting a $4,500 MBA from a place like Carolina University, which is nationally accredited is better than getting a $9,900 MBA from some place like Eastern University, which is regionally accredited? I k now that it is not a degree mill, like the unaccredited programs. I am just exploring the utility.
What is the utility of nationally accredited MBA programs like this vs the super cheap regionally accredited programs? I will admit that I am not up to speed on much with national accreditation. I remember reading about it more during the mid-2000's, when schools like Aspen U getting DETC accreditation and offering doctorates sparked a lot of discussion on the sister boards. This was back when there were far fewer options.
I used to work for a US state government and having any nationally/regionally accredited masters degree (as a checkbox) works equally well in getting promoted to certain job levels. I think those who would choose the $4,500 nationally accredited option are those who just want the checkbox and are living paycheck to paycheck right now so that an additional 5K might mean the difference between a masters and no masters. For people who are financially flexible, obviously the decision can be made based on far more factors than money.
That is a legit reason, especially if you are a career federal employee. Why pay more money, when you just need to check the box to go to the next paygrade? Thanks!
MS, Data Science, Eastern University
ALM, Information Technology, Harvard University
AB, Government, Georgetown University
In Progress: MS, Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology (Projected Completion 2027)
ALM, Information Technology, Harvard University
AB, Government, Georgetown University
In Progress: MS, Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology (Projected Completion 2027)