04-07-2015, 10:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2015, 12:12 AM by KittenMittens.)
Meh, of course Justice Sotomayor is going to be for affirmative action considering it benefited her.
"“Let me be clear about what affirmative action must not ... It does not mean – and I don’t favor – the unjustified preference of the unqualified over the qualified of any race or gender. It doesn’t mean – and I don’t favor – numerical quotas. It doesn’t mean – and I don’t favor – rejection or selection of any employee or student solely on the basis of race or gender without regard to merit…”"
But that's exactly what it is today and always has been. Just look at how today Mindy Kaling's Indian brother pretended to be black and how medical schools swooned over him as a result. Changed his name from Vijay to JoJo, said he was black, and he was getting admissions left and right - this was after he applied once as an Indian and rejected everywhere...
It's a way for underrepresented minorities get an easy pass, many/most that should not be entitled to that benefit. You would never realistically hear a story about an Asian or White person getting into 8 ivy league schools A) it would never happen (it just wouldn't unless they discovered the cure for HIV [and the research that's done in high school is just bench pipetting half the time thanks to the parents being friends with a doctor/scientist in a lab) and B) even if it did, it wouldn't be such a big story like "oh look a black kid got into all 8 ivy league schools!". Anecdotally, a physics professor/friend, told me in confidence, that a graduate programs would bend over backwards if a student was black and female. It's like winning the lottery as far as admissions go.
I've seen Asian and South Asian kids with higher SAT scores, higher GPAs, and even more impressive stats get rejected from all ivy leagues, except for maybe one of the "easier to get into" ivy's like Cornell. Happens all the time. My son for instance, top 10 in class, 4.0 GPA, all 5s on AP courses, strong E.C.s, and a 1520/1600 SAT score rejected from ivy league schools, but his friend who was half-Columbian and half-Afghani with a 1300/1600 SAT score, far far richer than us, little AP courses, and with a 3.6 GPA, got into Dartmouth and Brown...
The system is definitely rigged against Asians which is why, for example, California's Supreme Court ruled that UC's system cannot be based on a quota.That's why when you walk on UC Berkeley's campus it's literally 50% Asians, but you know what? That's merit and I'm completely happy with that because society seems to be ok with casually disregarding Asians as if they're 2nd class citizens and/or casually being racist as if it's socially acceptable but of course not for blacks. All we can do is work hard, but even then, we're turned down because we're "overrepresented" and not the right hue nor politically enfranchised...
So I don't really care about what the policies are supposed to be for AA; what they say is very different than how it's actually done (much like how the police and court systems should treat you with the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, in reality it's more like guilty until proven innocent!). I tend to agree that affirmative action delegitimizes the accomplishments of qualified blacks like this individual who did well in school and SATs and is obviously qualified, but we can't still discount that his race had a big impact on getting into all ivy league schools which is the upsetting part. [COLOR="#800000"]He wasn't the first black kid to do this either, another one did that the year before. [/COLOR] So if that doesn't scream affirmative action, then I don't know what else does.
And yes, I do agree that privileged white women in particular are some of the primary recipients of these types of policies which is is clearly not what these policies were designed for (they should be for people who are disadvantaged; not for the advancement of people who are already comfortable and well off). As a woman, I'm not really into the feminist movement in America because we're already at an equal level with men, and probably have more opportunities for school and careers in general. Those statistics that women make less than men are just hogwash. That commonly cited statistic, for example, that women get 77 cents to the dollar for men was debunked, yet even the President spews this crap. No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. [COLOR="#B22222"]The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.[/COLOR]
In any case I'm very much against AA (obviously I'm biased since I'm Indian) because it's a pass for people based on the color of their skin based off of events from 100 - 200 years ago and not current socioeconomic conditions. Did slavery destroy families, break their cultures, etc.? If it did then at least only apply it to African-Americans and not Nigerians. I never really understood white guilt so much as historically all races have embraced slavery and in fact, most slavery is practiced in Africa today. and it could be argued that slavery was originally practiced by Africans. I'm definitely not condoning slavery, but as an Indian, who grew up in country seeing extreme poverty, and "servants," it annoys me how blacks are put on a pedestal in the West when everyone else in the world, including blacks, have been doing the same thing too.
"“Let me be clear about what affirmative action must not ... It does not mean – and I don’t favor – the unjustified preference of the unqualified over the qualified of any race or gender. It doesn’t mean – and I don’t favor – numerical quotas. It doesn’t mean – and I don’t favor – rejection or selection of any employee or student solely on the basis of race or gender without regard to merit…”"
But that's exactly what it is today and always has been. Just look at how today Mindy Kaling's Indian brother pretended to be black and how medical schools swooned over him as a result. Changed his name from Vijay to JoJo, said he was black, and he was getting admissions left and right - this was after he applied once as an Indian and rejected everywhere...
It's a way for underrepresented minorities get an easy pass, many/most that should not be entitled to that benefit. You would never realistically hear a story about an Asian or White person getting into 8 ivy league schools A) it would never happen (it just wouldn't unless they discovered the cure for HIV [and the research that's done in high school is just bench pipetting half the time thanks to the parents being friends with a doctor/scientist in a lab) and B) even if it did, it wouldn't be such a big story like "oh look a black kid got into all 8 ivy league schools!". Anecdotally, a physics professor/friend, told me in confidence, that a graduate programs would bend over backwards if a student was black and female. It's like winning the lottery as far as admissions go.
I've seen Asian and South Asian kids with higher SAT scores, higher GPAs, and even more impressive stats get rejected from all ivy leagues, except for maybe one of the "easier to get into" ivy's like Cornell. Happens all the time. My son for instance, top 10 in class, 4.0 GPA, all 5s on AP courses, strong E.C.s, and a 1520/1600 SAT score rejected from ivy league schools, but his friend who was half-Columbian and half-Afghani with a 1300/1600 SAT score, far far richer than us, little AP courses, and with a 3.6 GPA, got into Dartmouth and Brown...
The system is definitely rigged against Asians which is why, for example, California's Supreme Court ruled that UC's system cannot be based on a quota.That's why when you walk on UC Berkeley's campus it's literally 50% Asians, but you know what? That's merit and I'm completely happy with that because society seems to be ok with casually disregarding Asians as if they're 2nd class citizens and/or casually being racist as if it's socially acceptable but of course not for blacks. All we can do is work hard, but even then, we're turned down because we're "overrepresented" and not the right hue nor politically enfranchised...
So I don't really care about what the policies are supposed to be for AA; what they say is very different than how it's actually done (much like how the police and court systems should treat you with the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, in reality it's more like guilty until proven innocent!). I tend to agree that affirmative action delegitimizes the accomplishments of qualified blacks like this individual who did well in school and SATs and is obviously qualified, but we can't still discount that his race had a big impact on getting into all ivy league schools which is the upsetting part. [COLOR="#800000"]He wasn't the first black kid to do this either, another one did that the year before. [/COLOR] So if that doesn't scream affirmative action, then I don't know what else does.
And yes, I do agree that privileged white women in particular are some of the primary recipients of these types of policies which is is clearly not what these policies were designed for (they should be for people who are disadvantaged; not for the advancement of people who are already comfortable and well off). As a woman, I'm not really into the feminist movement in America because we're already at an equal level with men, and probably have more opportunities for school and careers in general. Those statistics that women make less than men are just hogwash. That commonly cited statistic, for example, that women get 77 cents to the dollar for men was debunked, yet even the President spews this crap. No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. [COLOR="#B22222"]The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.[/COLOR]
In any case I'm very much against AA (obviously I'm biased since I'm Indian) because it's a pass for people based on the color of their skin based off of events from 100 - 200 years ago and not current socioeconomic conditions. Did slavery destroy families, break their cultures, etc.? If it did then at least only apply it to African-Americans and not Nigerians. I never really understood white guilt so much as historically all races have embraced slavery and in fact, most slavery is practiced in Africa today. and it could be argued that slavery was originally practiced by Africans. I'm definitely not condoning slavery, but as an Indian, who grew up in country seeing extreme poverty, and "servants," it annoys me how blacks are put on a pedestal in the West when everyone else in the world, including blacks, have been doing the same thing too.
A) Why a Charter Oak BS in Business Admin is easier to get than a TESU BS in Business Admin degree.
B) Charter Oak State College's Easy BS in Business Administration Degree Plan + Test Out Options
B.S. in Business Administration, Charter Oak State College 2015
B) Charter Oak State College's Easy BS in Business Administration Degree Plan + Test Out Options
B.S. in Business Administration, Charter Oak State College 2015