>>>I guess I don't really like your tone TBH. <<<<
That's too bad, but I would hope no one would like your tone at a site like this which is basically a tone of defending a course that borders on fraud: substandard curriculum, fake accreditation. Can't stress enough that teaching has an affect on people's lives and one should be properly trained for that. I have a hard time believing you don't feel the same way, but you're just remaining defensive in this case because your son is involved, at least that's what I hope anyway...
>>>I would be annoyed too if a cheap certificate would substitute for the knowledge that I have in international business.<<<
So now you're agreeing with my logic... although to be clear, in this case it doesn't substitute, it frauds. Let's call it what it is, lol.
>>>I do think we're talking about different things.<<<
Noooo, we really aren't... different view of ethics, absolutely, but the same topic.
>>>No "real" teachers are losing their job to the online Chinese schools.. trust me on that one.<<<
A person who was taught by a legitimate TEFL school and achieved certification is a real teacher of the subject. Your attempt to create some sort of separate category is an exercise of defense and not a very good one either.
>>>There is WAY more demand than they can fill, which is why a few schools hire people without any credentials other than a basic education, but almost always a bachelor's and sometimes college students working toward one.<<<
CORRECTED.
>>> If you re-read the original post, I don't think that I was trying to lead someone down the path of butt-in-seat ESL teaching with the Groupon.<<<
I don't need to "re-read" anything (oooo there's my "tone" again) because the debate was never about butt-in-seat anything. That's totally irrelevant.
If I'm not mistaken, this forum's primary target is distance learning, so that makes the point even less relevant. It doesn't matter if the job is in-seat or virtual, a person should be properly trained to teach and most schools actually do require that you are. There are always schools that don't, but the idea that those who don't dominate the job market is simply not accurate as pretty much every online school I've seen with an ad required at least a bachelors degree and all but one did not require a certification and even that one said you had to be working toward one, so...
>>>> Having taken the Groupon ESL for NO reason other than just for fun, I can say it was beneficial. Accreditation or no, it was fun.<<<
Dandy! Just DANDY! But no one should be teaching with that, it's a crummy course that does not prepare a person to teach ESL. 120 hours and proper 3rd party oversight is the standard, and since the course doesn't clear either checkbox, it doesn't cut the mustard.
>>>I don't think there's any "luck" to run out when this is not my son's field nor is it mine<<<
I think the point I made was well stated. IF IF IF a person decides to teach in this field in the future, yes luck will run out. I was pretty clear in qualifying how that would work...
>>> I'm glad you've told us again and again that it's not from an accredited school - good to know<<<
You're exaggerating about the frequency of my mentioning that, but good that you know...
>>> I am certain that anyone out there who wants to go into ESL would do their homework and know this. <<<
Because you're not in that world you may not realize how many fake TEFL courses there are and how many are touting fake accreditation. It's a big problem. In a situation like this, homework is difficult when so many are frauding and there is so little information about it. There are even some legit schools that have used fake accreditation just to keep up! LOL! So the last thing we should do is give any positive light to another crap course. I can also tell you from experience how many people go through these trash courses and make a mess with the students and the schools. That's the side you don't see that I have seen and this is part of why I speak up when I see a bad course being promoted in any way.
>>> For my son's purpose, it's been better than not having any teaching knowledge. <<<
Going through that course, a person still wouldn't have any teaching knowledge...
The course is junk. JUNK! LOL!
>>> Don't worry - he was getting hired anyway, so no, he didn't take some poor helpless person's job.<<<
Ahhh, but you don't know that. There could've been someone who was vastly more qualified but he interviewed just a tad bit better and they didn't get the job. Who knows? Jobs aren't unlimited, every school be it in-person or online only staffs so many teachers. But if he was getting hired anyway, seems like there was no reason to throw on a junk cert from a junk school. If it led to higher pay that's even worse, I know I'd feel guilty using it for that, but hey, not everyone sees ethics in the same way. I've learned that many people don't see them at all...
That's too bad, but I would hope no one would like your tone at a site like this which is basically a tone of defending a course that borders on fraud: substandard curriculum, fake accreditation. Can't stress enough that teaching has an affect on people's lives and one should be properly trained for that. I have a hard time believing you don't feel the same way, but you're just remaining defensive in this case because your son is involved, at least that's what I hope anyway...
>>>I would be annoyed too if a cheap certificate would substitute for the knowledge that I have in international business.<<<
So now you're agreeing with my logic... although to be clear, in this case it doesn't substitute, it frauds. Let's call it what it is, lol.
>>>I do think we're talking about different things.<<<
Noooo, we really aren't... different view of ethics, absolutely, but the same topic.
>>>No "real" teachers are losing their job to the online Chinese schools.. trust me on that one.<<<
A person who was taught by a legitimate TEFL school and achieved certification is a real teacher of the subject. Your attempt to create some sort of separate category is an exercise of defense and not a very good one either.
>>>There is WAY more demand than they can fill, which is why a few schools hire people without any credentials other than a basic education, but almost always a bachelor's and sometimes college students working toward one.<<<
CORRECTED.
>>> If you re-read the original post, I don't think that I was trying to lead someone down the path of butt-in-seat ESL teaching with the Groupon.<<<
I don't need to "re-read" anything (oooo there's my "tone" again) because the debate was never about butt-in-seat anything. That's totally irrelevant.
If I'm not mistaken, this forum's primary target is distance learning, so that makes the point even less relevant. It doesn't matter if the job is in-seat or virtual, a person should be properly trained to teach and most schools actually do require that you are. There are always schools that don't, but the idea that those who don't dominate the job market is simply not accurate as pretty much every online school I've seen with an ad required at least a bachelors degree and all but one did not require a certification and even that one said you had to be working toward one, so...
>>>> Having taken the Groupon ESL for NO reason other than just for fun, I can say it was beneficial. Accreditation or no, it was fun.<<<
Dandy! Just DANDY! But no one should be teaching with that, it's a crummy course that does not prepare a person to teach ESL. 120 hours and proper 3rd party oversight is the standard, and since the course doesn't clear either checkbox, it doesn't cut the mustard.
>>>I don't think there's any "luck" to run out when this is not my son's field nor is it mine<<<
I think the point I made was well stated. IF IF IF a person decides to teach in this field in the future, yes luck will run out. I was pretty clear in qualifying how that would work...
>>> I'm glad you've told us again and again that it's not from an accredited school - good to know<<<
You're exaggerating about the frequency of my mentioning that, but good that you know...
>>> I am certain that anyone out there who wants to go into ESL would do their homework and know this. <<<
Because you're not in that world you may not realize how many fake TEFL courses there are and how many are touting fake accreditation. It's a big problem. In a situation like this, homework is difficult when so many are frauding and there is so little information about it. There are even some legit schools that have used fake accreditation just to keep up! LOL! So the last thing we should do is give any positive light to another crap course. I can also tell you from experience how many people go through these trash courses and make a mess with the students and the schools. That's the side you don't see that I have seen and this is part of why I speak up when I see a bad course being promoted in any way.
>>> For my son's purpose, it's been better than not having any teaching knowledge. <<<
Going through that course, a person still wouldn't have any teaching knowledge...
The course is junk. JUNK! LOL!
>>> Don't worry - he was getting hired anyway, so no, he didn't take some poor helpless person's job.<<<
Ahhh, but you don't know that. There could've been someone who was vastly more qualified but he interviewed just a tad bit better and they didn't get the job. Who knows? Jobs aren't unlimited, every school be it in-person or online only staffs so many teachers. But if he was getting hired anyway, seems like there was no reason to throw on a junk cert from a junk school. If it led to higher pay that's even worse, I know I'd feel guilty using it for that, but hey, not everyone sees ethics in the same way. I've learned that many people don't see them at all...