@newdegree
First off I made a suggestion based on the accreditation issues suggesting that they look into other options.
You're just not getting it. Wording and tone matter.
Second, take my advice as "rude" if you shall take it I couldn't care less.
I don't take it as "advice" at all. And it was rude, objectively. Again, you're just not getting it. Saying you "couldn't care less" is exactly at the core of the problem and it adds credence to my point. But you not getting it won't have me miss a wink of sleep.
I know my degrees are good at the end of the day
Good for you. And so are his. You have no idea what his legitimate degrees may have done for him, and for all you know they may have him in a better position in life than you are in, you just have no way of knowing which is another reason why your post was out of line. Simply because you have an issue with his degrees doesn't mean there is an issue in reality in the larger sense or with his life specifically. It's more complex than that.
Neither VUL nor ENEB are the greatest schools, they have plenty of issues, we all know this, and I've had a lot to say about them myself here. But, I can easily point to RA schools that have plenty of issues and have been in unbelievable scandals far beyond any of the things discussed here. This desire for people to act as if RA schools are all automatically of acceptable quality and all NA schools are not, is nonsense. There are tons of RA schools operating at lower quality levels than a lot of NA schools, and I've been with a number of them myself and know from firsthand experience. I've been with bad RA schools and good NA schools, and bad NA schools and good RA schools. I've been with A LOT of schools, so I know that it all varies.
In the end, if employers even cared about this and believed it to be the way you see it, every school that was under the NA designation would've been gone generations ago, but that didn't happen.
I'd be way more concerned with the 10s of thousands of people holding good paying and high positions with fake degrees, so many of them littering LinkedIn. That's a REAL issue, not this.
It is best that you stay in your lane.
There you go again. You have no idea what my lane is, so it's best you take heed to your own suggestion there.
Honestly, I could look just at your signature and point out some real glaring issues with your education history, including the school and program you're currently studying in. But what good will that do? Unless you're going to an unaccredited diploma mill and don't realize it (which at that point someone should say something about it), it wouldn't be up to me or anybody else here to start chipping away at your record under the guise of "advice". People should choose the path that works for them, it's not an invitation for unsolicited scrutiny by total strangers, smh.
I don't have to provide any response to any forum post.
You sure don't, and I don't have to provide any more responses to you on this, and I won't. I've said my piece.
First off I made a suggestion based on the accreditation issues suggesting that they look into other options.
You're just not getting it. Wording and tone matter.
Second, take my advice as "rude" if you shall take it I couldn't care less.
I don't take it as "advice" at all. And it was rude, objectively. Again, you're just not getting it. Saying you "couldn't care less" is exactly at the core of the problem and it adds credence to my point. But you not getting it won't have me miss a wink of sleep.
I know my degrees are good at the end of the day
Good for you. And so are his. You have no idea what his legitimate degrees may have done for him, and for all you know they may have him in a better position in life than you are in, you just have no way of knowing which is another reason why your post was out of line. Simply because you have an issue with his degrees doesn't mean there is an issue in reality in the larger sense or with his life specifically. It's more complex than that.
Neither VUL nor ENEB are the greatest schools, they have plenty of issues, we all know this, and I've had a lot to say about them myself here. But, I can easily point to RA schools that have plenty of issues and have been in unbelievable scandals far beyond any of the things discussed here. This desire for people to act as if RA schools are all automatically of acceptable quality and all NA schools are not, is nonsense. There are tons of RA schools operating at lower quality levels than a lot of NA schools, and I've been with a number of them myself and know from firsthand experience. I've been with bad RA schools and good NA schools, and bad NA schools and good RA schools. I've been with A LOT of schools, so I know that it all varies.
In the end, if employers even cared about this and believed it to be the way you see it, every school that was under the NA designation would've been gone generations ago, but that didn't happen.
I'd be way more concerned with the 10s of thousands of people holding good paying and high positions with fake degrees, so many of them littering LinkedIn. That's a REAL issue, not this.
It is best that you stay in your lane.
There you go again. You have no idea what my lane is, so it's best you take heed to your own suggestion there.
Honestly, I could look just at your signature and point out some real glaring issues with your education history, including the school and program you're currently studying in. But what good will that do? Unless you're going to an unaccredited diploma mill and don't realize it (which at that point someone should say something about it), it wouldn't be up to me or anybody else here to start chipping away at your record under the guise of "advice". People should choose the path that works for them, it's not an invitation for unsolicited scrutiny by total strangers, smh.
I don't have to provide any response to any forum post.
You sure don't, and I don't have to provide any more responses to you on this, and I won't. I've said my piece.
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)
