REA=bad prep for Intro to Psych

[cookderosa]

I just got home from taking Intro to Psychology and it scared the fire out of me.
That was the 1st time I've ever pressed the "submit scores" button and really thought I hadn't passed. I did a ton of answer choice elimination and as a result, used up most of my time. As it turned out, I somehow ended up with a 68.
I studied solely the REA review and took two practice tests. I went in with a very good grasp of the material in the REA book and was tested on a lot of material that simply wasn't included in the REA review.
So, that being said I strongly advise against using the REA book as a sole resource for this test. Supplement it. Heavily.

REA, up til now, has been awesome CLEP prep for me but sadly, this book falls well short of that standard.:toetap:

but you scored a 68? How were you unprepared? One could argue that you were over-prepared. Your score certainly represents a mastery of the subject according the the expect level of competency for a PSYCH101 student. I used a college text and I think I scored in the mid 50's, so when I saw your score, I'd consider that a reason TO use the ERA book.