08-03-2021, 01:59 PM
(08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
I know several people who have become DEATHLY ill after taking the vaccine. So shouldn't the reverse be true? If you take a non-FDA approved vaccine and then become sick, shouldn't they refuse to pay for your medical treatment? I mean, you took a risky unapproved vaccine that hasn't been out for long, and the illness it was totally preventable - all you had to do was refuse this experiment, and yet you took it anyway.
TESU BSBA/HR 2018 - WVNCC BOG AAS 2017 - GGU Cert in Mgmt 2000
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA