Ethical caution

[Shadowless]

As to the question asked by Shadowless, let me provide this heavily-edited response:

Your implication is not only inaccurate based on the gcalvin post (Gary clearly stated that he's commenting on developments he's noticed lately--he's LONG since passed all his tests), it is also immature, disrespectful, small-minded and otherwise everything that gcalvin and the instantcert forum is not.

I apologize if it was taken as such, I was not attempting to be rude, or immature or anything. I was just wondering if he waited until he finished testing, and used all the feedback provided before he brought this up. I have been using this forum for nearly a year and the feedback has always been the same at least since I have been using this forum. So that's why I was questioning the development part since it's been like this for a long time.

It's hard for me to debate this information because if you (not you personally) are going to ask what is compromise and what is not you are going to run into alot of debate. For example, IC itself, if CLEP or Dante knew about this service I am almost willing to bet it would be shut down.

Clep test itself warns about discussing ANYTHING about the test, and like I have said in another post, IC has several questions that were identical to the questions on the exam. I am sure CLEP and Dante would question where his study material came from to begin with.

My point is, it's hard to debate was is over board. I agree with the above poster, blantely giving out the question and answers is over board, everything else is fair game. I see no difference between the specific exam feedback forum and the IC study cards.