02-04-2018, 06:50 PM
I feel strongly about this.
This very topic is the main reason I was reticent to go the alternative route.
I cringe everytime I see a brand new poster, saying they need a complete four year degree in a few months as a job requirement or something. I cringe when I read about people knocking out HUGE amounts of credit in super-short time frames.
BECAUSE
When someone questions them on one of those topics; I hope they can articulate well. Speed degrees that leave the holder as empty-headed as when they begun will do nothing but make the path harder for legitimate seekers.
I am a very, very fast reader and typically a quick study. To have to slog through classes I already had mastery of the subject material butt-in-seat fashion would have been prohibitive in both cost and time, and I probably would not have finished. Maybe. Probably not.
As I went on my college journey, I found there was much still to be learned. And I still hold concerns that people will remain to look at non-traditional paths as inferior to legacy methods. I am glad this path was available to me, I am especially glad that Aleks was available, and I'll make the best of what I did.
But, I don't find what he said insulting OR demeaning. I can't say that I unequivocally agree with his thought; but I think it's a conversation that deserves to be had. And, there is some merit in questioning retention of knowledge and skills via compressed schedule learning. I don't feel, after doing it, that it is the best path for people that didn't have previous exposure to the majority of it.
Interesting discussion...
This very topic is the main reason I was reticent to go the alternative route.
I cringe everytime I see a brand new poster, saying they need a complete four year degree in a few months as a job requirement or something. I cringe when I read about people knocking out HUGE amounts of credit in super-short time frames.
BECAUSE
When someone questions them on one of those topics; I hope they can articulate well. Speed degrees that leave the holder as empty-headed as when they begun will do nothing but make the path harder for legitimate seekers.
I am a very, very fast reader and typically a quick study. To have to slog through classes I already had mastery of the subject material butt-in-seat fashion would have been prohibitive in both cost and time, and I probably would not have finished. Maybe. Probably not.
As I went on my college journey, I found there was much still to be learned. And I still hold concerns that people will remain to look at non-traditional paths as inferior to legacy methods. I am glad this path was available to me, I am especially glad that Aleks was available, and I'll make the best of what I did.
But, I don't find what he said insulting OR demeaning. I can't say that I unequivocally agree with his thought; but I think it's a conversation that deserves to be had. And, there is some merit in questioning retention of knowledge and skills via compressed schedule learning. I don't feel, after doing it, that it is the best path for people that didn't have previous exposure to the majority of it.
Interesting discussion...
Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Studies Thomas Edison State University 2018
Cert in Emergency Management - Three Rivers CC 2017
Cert in Basic Police Ed - Walters State CC 1996
Current Goal: new job
Working on: securing funding I don't have to pay back for a Masters.
Up Next: Toying with Masters Programs
Finished: First Degree
Older Experience with: PLA / Portfolios, RPNow, Proctor U, ACE, NCCRS, DAVAR Academy (formerly Tor), Straighterline, TESU, Ed4Credit, Study.com, The Institutes, Kaplan, ALEKS, FEMA IS, NFA IS, brick & mortar community colleges, LOTS of vocational schools...
My list of academic courses: link