11-27-2017, 03:27 PM
There is another thread on here about NationsU and some students who are interested in their program. It was getting a little long so I figured I would start my own thread sharing my progress and observations about the program.
I officially started on November 10. My goal is to finish the MTS in one year. I’m not sure how realistic that deadline is. It is too early to tell. My initial observation is that there is a LOT of reading and writing in these courses. Most likely the courses will vary in length and difficulty, but to finish in one year you need to average one course a month plus the three comprehensive exams (which may require additional weeks to study for).
The courses are laid out in a very straightforward manner through the use of an online syllabus. Within the syllabus are links to outside sources (videos, articles, etc). You are prompted when to take exams, complete written assignments, post in student forums or consult outside textbooks. The instructions are detailed enough to complete these successfully. The exams are directly over material they instruct you to read/study – no surprises or tricky questions. I’ve found all the ones I’ve taken to be pretty fair.
For the first course, MRS622, there are three exams, three written assignments (a paragraph or two each), about a dozen student forum posts and a final “essay” which needs to be a minimum of 2,000 words, APA format, with eight scholarly sources (think mini-capstone paper if you happened to take LIB495 at TESU – my paper was about 15 pages long when I finished it). I completed the course in about a week and scored high 90’s on everything. (Side note: I had finished all the suggested reading before the course started.) However, that first course really is just an introduction and not indicative of what the other courses are like.
The course I’m in currently is M1, Survey of the Old Testament. It covers the entire OT and asks you to read it through several times, plus work your way through a pretty long syllabus. Now, here is where that whole competency-based education comes into play. Technically, with enough background knowledge you can go straight to the exams and written assignments without all the extra reading/study. However, after the survey courses (M1 and M2) you have to take a comprehensive proctored exam. What I’ve heard from other students is that they breezed through the survey courses by doing just that – going directly to the exams & written assignments - but then had to backtrack to study for the comprehensive exam. This caused them to lose weeks, even months in preparation. I’m choosing to go more slowly and approach the courses as study for the comprehensive exam so I don’t have to backtrack. I think this will be a lot faster overall, even though it means it may take longer to get through a course.
Another reason to go through these courses more slowly (IMO) is because grade-point matters. You have to have a 3.0 on these foundation courses to be accepted into the program. To maintain this, I want every single point I can get from those module exams. The written assignments count for 40% of the course grade. Not knowing how strictly they will grade those, I would prefer to get as many points on the exams as I can so I don’t lose (as much) sleep over the written assignments. You only need 70% to pass an exam but why give up 30% if you don’t need to?
I guess it’s up to the individual student how they want to approach these foundation courses. I know I could probably do fairly well on the exams taking them cold if my intent was just to pass. Maybe after I get a few courses in I'll feel a little more relaxed. But, until I can get used to a new format / being graded over written assignments etc I'll do what I usually do - over-study and over-prepare.
So far, I’m really enjoying it and I hope to update as I progress through the courses and gain new, fresher perspectives.
I officially started on November 10. My goal is to finish the MTS in one year. I’m not sure how realistic that deadline is. It is too early to tell. My initial observation is that there is a LOT of reading and writing in these courses. Most likely the courses will vary in length and difficulty, but to finish in one year you need to average one course a month plus the three comprehensive exams (which may require additional weeks to study for).
The courses are laid out in a very straightforward manner through the use of an online syllabus. Within the syllabus are links to outside sources (videos, articles, etc). You are prompted when to take exams, complete written assignments, post in student forums or consult outside textbooks. The instructions are detailed enough to complete these successfully. The exams are directly over material they instruct you to read/study – no surprises or tricky questions. I’ve found all the ones I’ve taken to be pretty fair.
For the first course, MRS622, there are three exams, three written assignments (a paragraph or two each), about a dozen student forum posts and a final “essay” which needs to be a minimum of 2,000 words, APA format, with eight scholarly sources (think mini-capstone paper if you happened to take LIB495 at TESU – my paper was about 15 pages long when I finished it). I completed the course in about a week and scored high 90’s on everything. (Side note: I had finished all the suggested reading before the course started.) However, that first course really is just an introduction and not indicative of what the other courses are like.
The course I’m in currently is M1, Survey of the Old Testament. It covers the entire OT and asks you to read it through several times, plus work your way through a pretty long syllabus. Now, here is where that whole competency-based education comes into play. Technically, with enough background knowledge you can go straight to the exams and written assignments without all the extra reading/study. However, after the survey courses (M1 and M2) you have to take a comprehensive proctored exam. What I’ve heard from other students is that they breezed through the survey courses by doing just that – going directly to the exams & written assignments - but then had to backtrack to study for the comprehensive exam. This caused them to lose weeks, even months in preparation. I’m choosing to go more slowly and approach the courses as study for the comprehensive exam so I don’t have to backtrack. I think this will be a lot faster overall, even though it means it may take longer to get through a course.
Another reason to go through these courses more slowly (IMO) is because grade-point matters. You have to have a 3.0 on these foundation courses to be accepted into the program. To maintain this, I want every single point I can get from those module exams. The written assignments count for 40% of the course grade. Not knowing how strictly they will grade those, I would prefer to get as many points on the exams as I can so I don’t lose (as much) sleep over the written assignments. You only need 70% to pass an exam but why give up 30% if you don’t need to?
I guess it’s up to the individual student how they want to approach these foundation courses. I know I could probably do fairly well on the exams taking them cold if my intent was just to pass. Maybe after I get a few courses in I'll feel a little more relaxed. But, until I can get used to a new format / being graded over written assignments etc I'll do what I usually do - over-study and over-prepare.
So far, I’m really enjoying it and I hope to update as I progress through the courses and gain new, fresher perspectives.
MTS Nations University - September 2018
BA.LS.SS Thomas Edison State University -September 2017
BA.LS.SS Thomas Edison State University -September 2017