ENEB New Master Thread

[Robson]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

[PearsonBTEC7Qualifi45]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

It really sounds like 6 in 1 hand and half a dozen in the other. 

I am concerned that it still won't be helpful with say Validential as an example. Validential insists it cannot evaluate the Isabel I Diploma simply due to the statement on the diploma that says "This course had been taught by Escuela de Negocios Europea de Barcelona and certified by Universidad Internacional I de Castilla, within the framework of the Cooperation Agreement established between Universidad Isabel I and Escuela de Negocios Europea de Barcelona."

As if accredited Universities in Spain are not allowed to collaborate with training academies, it is nothing new. I want to talk to Validential and get some more answers from them. 

Nevertheless, I want to give the Convalidation a try and see if it does help in other instances.  I am not even convinced that the transcript will read as "Universidad Isabel I". it might say "Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB" on it (followed by "Issued by ISEB" on it somewhere). I don't know how many people have signed up for the Convalidation, but I am happy to be a test subject and share the results and my experience here.

[InnovativeRecognizer]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

"This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB" is on the example diploma image, but the text on ENEB says something else: University-specific degree issued by Universidad Isabel I.

I guess the marketing team of ENEB just made this example diploma from the previous partnership (see date) (before UNISEB) of ISEB & Universidad Isabel I. Because the validation hasn't start yet.

[PearsonBTEC7Qualifi45]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

"This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB" is on the example diploma image, but the text on ENEB says something else: University-specific degree issued by Universidad Isabel I.

I guess the marketing team of ENEB just made this example diploma from the previous partnership (see date) (before UNISEB) of ISEB & Universidad Isabel I. Because the validation hasn't start yet.

I certainly hope so because it starts nicely, than it reads very similary to what we already have. Making almost no difference.   
Validential has refused to evaluate the Universidad Isabel I Diploma for this very same reason, that there's an asterisk* and a statement on the back which reads that the course was taught by ENEB through a collaboration agreement.  It says something like this on the front as well that ENEB is the teaching institution.  I don't understand their logic. It's not as if that's some kind of hidden agenda.

It wasn't incredibly expensive, and I, like most people on here, enjoy learning, so I don't mind giving the convalidation a go.

[JC39]

Just to clarify from my side:
• I did submit all ENEB certificates and transcripts, along with the Universidad Isabel I (Ui1) Diploma to ECE.
• The ECE report only evaluates the Ui1 Diploma for RA credit, as expected. ENEB courses show up as non-credit studies.
• Regarding the “global masters” I mentioned earlier, I believe those were already evaluated separately, not through ENEB. That might be why they don’t appear in this ECE report.

So yes, everything required from my end for ECE evaluation was submitted correctly..ECE just doesn’t assess ENEB hours for RA credit. I am very frustrated about all this. I wish these diplomas will be evaluated properly

[PearsonBTEC7Qualifi45]

Just to clarify from my side:
• I did submit all ENEB certificates and transcripts, along with the Universidad Isabel I (Ui1) Diploma to ECE.
• The ECE report only evaluates the Ui1 Diploma for RA credit, as expected. ENEB courses show up as non-credit studies.
• Regarding the “global masters” I mentioned earlier, I believe those were already evaluated separately, not through ENEB. That might be why they don’t appear in this ECE report.

So yes, everything required from my end for ECE evaluation was submitted correctly..ECE just doesn’t assess ENEB hours for RA credit. I am very frustrated about all this. I wish these diplomas will be evaluated properly

Thank you so much for clarifying.  Yes, so this seems to be the norm by ECE, that they will evaluate ENEB degrees (for the Universidad Isabel I Diploma only) as completed RA equivalent Bachelor's Degrees, just not for RA credit, and no course-by-course evaluation with a GPA.

[Maltus]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

"This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB" is on the example diploma image, but the text on ENEB says something else: University-specific degree issued by Universidad Isabel I.

I guess the marketing team of ENEB just made this example diploma from the previous partnership (see date) (before UNISEB) of ISEB & Universidad Isabel I. Because the validation hasn't start yet.

I certainly hope so because it starts nicely, than it reads very similary to what we already have. Making almost no difference.   
Validential has refused to evaluate the Universidad Isabel I Diploma for this very same reason, that there's an asterisk* and a statement on the back which reads that the course was taught by ENEB through a collaboration agreement.  It says something like this on the front as well that ENEB is the teaching institution.  I don't understand their logic. It's not as if that's some kind of hidden agenda.

It wasn't incredibly expensive, and I, like most people on here, enjoy learning, so I don't mind giving the convalidation a go.

As far as I understand it, you do a 3-Step:
1. You get ENEB done.
2. You transfer to UNISEB with 8-Question-Quizzes per subject.
3. Via UNISEB / ISEB you do "missing classes" for UI1 and transfer to ui1, again by Quizzes OR by regular evaluation. And Kaboom - you get a titulo propio from UI1

They have it in this pdf, I guess: 
https://eneb.com/wp-content/uploads/2025...uniseb.pdf

[PearsonBTEC7Qualifi45]

So, the difference between the "University-Specific Degree" diploma (from the website): 

"Universidad Isabel I | UNISEB CERTIFIES that it grants this present specialization diploma in MBA – Master of Business Administration... This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB"

and the normal ENEB UI1 diploma:

"Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla certifies that XYZ has completed the studies corresponding to the programme indicated overleaf taught by ENEB and certified by Universidad Internacional Isabel I De Castilla... and issues the present certificate in MBA – Master of Business Administration."

"This title is certified by the Universidad Isabel I and issued by ISEB" is on the example diploma image, but the text on ENEB says something else: University-specific degree issued by Universidad Isabel I.

I guess the marketing team of ENEB just made this example diploma from the previous partnership (see date) (before UNISEB) of ISEB & Universidad Isabel I. Because the validation hasn't start yet.

I certainly hope so because it starts nicely, than it reads very similary to what we already have. Making almost no difference.   
Validential has refused to evaluate the Universidad Isabel I Diploma for this very same reason, that there's an asterisk* and a statement on the back which reads that the course was taught by ENEB through a collaboration agreement.  It says something like this on the front as well that ENEB is the teaching institution.  I don't understand their logic. It's not as if that's some kind of hidden agenda.

It wasn't incredibly expensive, and I, like most people on here, enjoy learning, so I don't mind giving the convalidation a go.

As far as I understand it, you do a 3-Step:
1. You get ENEB done.
2. You transfer to UNISEB with 8-Question-Quizzes per subject.
3. Via UNISEB / ISEB you do "missing classes" for UI1 and transfer to ui1, again by Quizzes OR by regular evaluation. And Kaboom - you get a titulo propio from UI1

They have it in this pdf, I guess: 
https://eneb.com/wp-content/uploads/2025...uniseb.pdf

Yes we were simply discussing what the Titulo Propio from Ui1 will actually look like and state once completed with UNISEB. So far the verbiage on the UNISEB marketing materials with the image of their Diploma still mentions issuance by ISEB. If you look at the landing page and zoom in on the Diploma image, you will see:
https://eneb.com/convunisebeur/

If you go to the ISEB website and look at a PDF of a UNISEB MBA, there are still 2 diplomas, one from "ISEB & Universidad Isabel I", and one from Universidad Isabel I.

ISEB's UNISEB MBA Page
https://iseb.es/programas-formativos-uni...anagement/

ISEB's UNISEB PDF
https://iseb.es/GUIAS/UNISEB/M/MBAI.pdf

[JC39]

I’ve been looking into the same thing and I agree with your observation that the UNISEB marketing still shows the diploma mockups with ISEB mentioned, even though the final award should be from Universidad Isabel I as a Título Propio. From what I’ve seen so far, the end result hasn’t really changed much compared to the old ENEB/ISEB + Ui1 setup: you’d still get the Ui1 propio diploma and a certificate from the training provider.

That’s why I don’t really see the added value of “UNISEB” if it’s only branding the MBA and not expanding to the other degrees. Unless it’s been clarified that evaluators in the U.S. (ECE, IEE, etc.) will recognize the Ui1 award differently under the UNISEB label, it feels like the outcome is the same, it comes down to how the Título Propio is interpreted.

Personally, if a Título Propio ends up transferring as RA master’s equivalent, then it could be worth it. But if not, going the evaluation route with ECE/IEE for RA bachelor’s or grad-level credits seems like the safer bet. I’m still waiting on my evaluation results and hoping for a favorable outcome, but right now I think sticking with a straight evaluator-recognized pathway makes the most sense.