06-26-2022, 10:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022, 11:33 AM by cacoleman1983.)
(06-26-2022, 07:48 AM)eLearner Wrote:(06-25-2022, 09:06 PM)eLearner Wrote: I think he may have meant, did they send just the ENEB diploma and ENEB transcript? Or just the Isabel diploma and ENEB transcript?
Now that I think of it, the question is a little more interesting because upon examining both public documents I see that both evaluations were done by the same person. So it really is a point of curiosity as to whether the same submitted materials yielded different results in terms of the school name used, or if different materials were sent which yielded different results.
With the first evaluation, I'm thinking that the evaluator may have looked at everything as an Isabel I document and evaluated everything coming from Isabel I since that is the accredited partner in the school relationship. This evaluation had more information about the school Isabel I as an accredited institution.
On the second go around, that same evaluator probably decided to acknowledge both schools because Isabel I is the accreditor but if you notice there was no discussion about ENEB as an accredited institution because ENEB is not independently accredited but is being viewed as a school housed in an accredited institution. The foreign grades were even included in the translation to the US grades. The second one is better than the first one as a more accurate display.