ENEB Master Thread

[ThatBankDude]

While an argument for evaluation goes on. There are many different accreditors. You all are arguing semantics. ENEB is authorized by a FIRST WORLD COUNTRY to grant degrees with Isabel. This is what should matter.

Evaluation equivalents are typically used for further schooling. You should want options.

I took and finished the MBA from ENEB, I can say it was a good amount of work for me, for my research as I took it seriously. My finals were about the same size as it was for UMPI. It's basically a competency based master's degree. If you all have a problem with them, then you should have a problem with this entire forum as almost every program is similar.

There is something very unseemly in your post post, marginalized and racialized  people can spot it from a mile away. However, There are many useless authorized schools in the USA and Canada. Anyone can get authorized to start a school.

Schools have to start somewhere. In my state, a school has to operate for a number of years, before they can get authorization, then they have to operate even longer for RA accreditation,

It really depends on your goal. ENEB can be a pathway for someone to achieve something else. Nearly every person on this forum has used an unaccredited provider to get an accredited credit somewhere else. Why is this different?

I have not. Every single one of my credits have come from an accredited university. East Central University is RA (I completed on-campus), SEOSU is RA and B-School is AACSB, and then Duke is RA and B-School is AACSB. I have never done CLEP, etc.