(06-05-2022, 05:01 PM)ashkir Wrote: If you dislike ENEB, do not continue to read the ENEB topic. This threat is intended to encourage consumers to continue searching for ENEB offers. It is identical to other message boards where individuals discuss grants, tuition reductions, etc. I have noticed it for several colleges. ENEB's pricing is typically restricted to this topic, and this will remain. ENEB is a recognized Spanish school, therefore debate is permitted here.
When did I ever wrote that I dislike Eneb, never. I have a master from eneb. But Eneb is a non-accredited institution offering non-accredited masters.
(06-05-2022, 02:55 PM)openair Wrote: dumber,
So if this board has dedicated entire sections to specific colleges (Thomas Edison, Excelsior, etc.), is it also "pushing their products"? Poeple on this forum exchange ideas about how to pay the least tuition for various college degrees. Is that also wrong? Personally, I don't care whether anyone purchases Universidad Isabel I - ENEB programs from any website. You're the one who appears to be angry or disappointed with your ENEB purchase and now you're coming to some far-fetched conclusions about other forum participants. I shared my own perspective on why I think that WES has reached the wrong conclusion, while ECE did a comparatively better job at evaluation. Am I entitled to this opinion, or is that also evidence of hating evaluators, as you put it?
I have a master from eneb. But Eneb is a non-accredited institution offering non-accredited masters.
(06-05-2022, 02:55 PM)openair Wrote: dumber,
So if this board has dedicated entire sections to specific colleges (Thomas Edison, Excelsior, etc.), is it also "pushing their products"? Poeple on this forum exchange ideas about how to pay the least tuition for various college degrees. Is that also wrong? Personally, I don't care whether anyone purchases Universidad Isabel I - ENEB programs from any website. You're the one who appears to be angry or disappointed with your ENEB purchase and now you're coming to some far-fetched conclusions about other forum participants. I shared my own perspective on why I think that WES has reached the wrong conclusion, while ECE did a comparatively better job at evaluation. Am I entitled to this opinion, or is that also evidence of hating evaluators, as you put it?
Isn’t this one of those fundamental fallacies comparing discussions of Thomas Edison and Excelsior with Eneb. Why not also included Harvard extension also while you are at it? Eneb is a non-accredited institution the others are not.