Please help check over my degree plan for TESU

[Ars457123]

Ah, so you lack self-awareness.?

Not half as much as you, I'm sure.

I said I skimmed the initial post, I didn't say that skimming is the nature of the forum. It may or may not be, I don't know other's habits. What I said was the nature of the forum was that no one is obligated to reply to every specific point brought up, and sometimes other issues are discussed in response to what is posted. That's pretty obvious, and you're childish showing right now is a good example of how things aren't always on topic, for better or for worse.?

Major errors aren't some side point, now are they? You're basically admitting that you stay on message for your project and derail if the need arises. That's exactly what I've seen.

No idea what you're saying here. Yes, I jump into a lot of posts, I'm an active member here.

I'm saying Gen Ed courses aren't some side point, for you to pretend otherwise by minimizing it is exactly why no one should listen to you. You jump into a lot of posts with basically the same posts almost verbatim to stay on a message you know nothing about:

unlike CLEP, it's less likely you'd fail anyway).

Again- How would you know?

Somehow I doubt "David Vise" is a "little girl" paid to spam this forum. Unless you're implying you are a little girl and I'm "attacking" you, but I also find this claim dubious.?

You didn't attack only David Vise, sneering "convenient" absolutely implied that they were in it together, and that's understood by anyone who reads that thread. You did attack that girl.

No one would argue this, it's also not what you've been suggesting here, though.?

Check the trash you've written because you've been arguing that from the start. AND you've missed the point, but I'm getting used to your fake obtuseness. I made a contrast between what I do with those online courses and what you do with CLEP, which is talk about it from a position of NO experience.

"I have not once stated CLEP is "hard."

Your kind never does. You've implied every chance you got. And because of the ham-fisted manner that you think is sly, every post mentioning CLEP has post upon post of you going on and on about how CLEP is so [insert negative thing] more than addressing the OP of any given thread that mentions CLEP.

I've said over and over again that it's a great option for many people, but that for me, personally, other options are much more convenient and easier for my, personal, learning style. CLEP

How would you know?

No one here has said anythign bad about CLEP. Some people have given their preference for other options, no one has said CLEP is a bad option, however. Re-read the thread but focus on retention of information.

When you say:

unlike CLEP, it's less likely you'd fail anyway).

What studies are you citing?

No, and I don't see that being done. Giving other options and reasons why you prefer those options is not lecturing. I have no problem with CLEP or people preferring CLEP. Have at it! I've given my reasons why I wasn't interesting in doing CLEPs. That doesn't mean I have anything against them or think others shouldn't, but you don't seem to grasp the difference between having a preference and "attacking" something.

I wrote in the post you are responding to, that baseless reasoning may not be an attack, but it's wrong. No worries, though, I will repeat it as many times as you like. Your baseless reasoning is wrong. Also, I knew you wouldn't be able to answer my question. And you do have something against them. You have a chip on your shoulder for anything that's not an open book test!

"We is specifically the group of people you put me in. You referrred to, specifically a group.

Well, if that's the we you're referring to, then this:

That's why we always include CLEP or DSST in the list of every other alternative we know when we build degree plans and such.

Is flat out wrong. Real inclusion means that it's properly labeled, and the values are represented accurately. Not making a study.com degree plan and slapping the word CLEP as an after thought.

Yes, putting your fingers in your ears is a great approach. No wonder you have no idea what's going on around here.

No, I didn't need to continue because your opinion is uninformed. Like my opinion of the Harvard Extension School, or my opinion on Patten. The only difference is that I don't comment on those schools. You have implied over and over that your baseless opinion is on par with CLEP takers. I hope anyone who would take advice from you is reading and taking note of this!

My post was well after the mother posted, so it was already clear she wasn't involved. You're intentionally just being dishonest now because you've been embarrassed in this thread. If you think I've ever "spammed" this thread, then we're clearly working on different definitions of "spam." I'm not shocked that you're confused about this.

I checked and about this one thing, you are correct, but you absolutely went after that little girl.

As soon as they offer!

So...Jan 2016

This whole temper tantrum you've been throwing here is literally because people have dared to suggest non-CLEP options.

Wrong! It's because you've been misrepresenting CLEP every chance you got, and I've been very clear on that. You're whiny compulsive need to go after every post that makes even the most casual reference to CLEP and reiterate(over and over again) you're own non experience is something much worse than a tantrum, that much is very clear.

Which is precisely why we give multiple options, much to your chagrin, even including CLEP.

LOL, no just no. What I wrote was in reply to this junk:

we often DO recommend CLEP language when appropriate.

It's not up to you decide what's appropriate. Those 'multiple options' are really narrow options that leave out a lot.