KittenMittens Wrote:Whoever said you can meet the requirements of the TECEP by not taking TECEPs for the 24 credit residency of the “per credit” plan? You’re wrong. The only ways you can meet the 24 credit residency requirement is by taking TECEPs, or coursework through TESC (and I think maybe Portfolio - but that is generally such a horrible option for most people because you have to spend a few hundred bucks to maybe get some credit - which is a big if).
Again with your assumptions on how people think and what is best for other people.
People have completed PLA's at TESC and had no problem.
KittenMittens Wrote:Most people tend to think that textbooks are dry, long, boring, sometimes poorly written, and so on.
Again with assumptions on how others think. SOME people read textbooks for fun.
KittenMittens Wrote:You’re just stating I’m wrong without backing it up - you’re giving opinions without any evidence. You were wrong about not having to take TECEPs through the “per credit” plan.
Read post number 5. you were given clear information regarding the per credit tuition plan, YOU are choosing to ignore the information you are being given. How many backups do you need? it is clear to everyone on this forum, it is on TESC's website, it has been said several times in this thread. What more do you need to understand? is it really that difficult for you to understand?
and then...
You just said it yourself - You can take courses, and you can do PLA's to meet the requirements.
Do you really think TESC created the "per credit" tuition plan for TECEP takers?
KittenMittens Wrote:Maybe you struggle with statistics as you've indicated in a previous thread, but it's significant enough to note that at least 10 people have complained about TECEPs.
Your reading comprehension skills are questionable...nowhere did I state that I struggled with statistics. It is interesting the way you make inferences, assumptions, and conclusions, very interesting.
You don't need to understand statistics to know that people share negative things more than they share positive.
You also stated that you spent hundreds of hours reading the forums etc. So you would know that people here have shared info about TECEPs and have completed a degree using them. You would also know that people share specific information on certain TECEPs and that there are courses available for quite a few TECEPs. Your problem is that you are choosing to ignore all the positive information.
Your 'data' is biased and inaccurate.
KittenMittens Wrote:This statement you made is just rhetorical and your arguments are becoming personal
I won't point out how many personal remarks you have made throughout this entire thread.
Maybe you should read back yourself and think about that.
Aleks: Beginning, Intermediate, College Algebra, Trigonometry, Intro to Statistics
Straighterline: Cultural Anthropology, Religion, Biology, Environmental Science, Philosophy, Eng Comp I, C++.
Working on - Eng Comp II, Intro Comm
Sophia Intro to Psych
TEEX: CYB101, CYB201, CYB301
NFA: Q318, Q118, Q137
Kaplan: Documenting Experiences
Goal: Complete Gen Ed. requirements.
Straighterline: Cultural Anthropology, Religion, Biology, Environmental Science, Philosophy, Eng Comp I, C++.
Working on - Eng Comp II, Intro Comm
Sophia Intro to Psych
TEEX: CYB101, CYB201, CYB301
NFA: Q318, Q118, Q137
Kaplan: Documenting Experiences
Goal: Complete Gen Ed. requirements.