Why Charter Oak State College is better than Thomas Edison State College

[sanantone]

I think most of the readers knew what I was saying. I quickly typed a title post as I don't post much on forums, but the intent/message was stating that a degree through Charter Oak would probably be more practical (in my opinion) compared to one for TESC for various reasons. Decent people know what I am saying rather than trying to politicize a trivial issue. If I really hated on TESC, then why would I actually prefer to go there? My first choice was TESC ideally but the lack of prep for TECEP exams was a major dealbreaker for me. I did my degree through COSC, and disliked having to do two courses through them, but it ended up being cheaper for me than TESC, and more practical thanks to the instantcert.com flash cards, practice exams available, and forum advice available for the topics. I think most students would agree that choosing between an exam where you have to study with a textbook alone is an unattractive option compared to one where there are study guides, practice exams, and student feedback forums on the types of exam questions, and topics covered.

Many of the people who have debated with you have never attended TESC. They have no bias toward the school. You also insulted Excelsior and COSC. Presentation is everything. You still have not provided a breakdown of your cost plan that current and/or former COSC students can critique. How are people supposed to follow your plan when it's vague?