I don't have too much time to respond because I'm going to take an exam this afternoon, but the problem with that kind of argument is that it just pushes the problem back one step and doesn't explain anything. It's called special pleading to say that everything must follow a specific rule and then invent something that conveniently doesn't need to follow that rule.
After you've decided without any evidence that there must have been an external cause, you are still no closer to knowing anything about it.
And it's really silly to say we are limited to the gods you mentioned. I could make up an infinite number of gods to meet those criteria if you gave me enough time.
Also... this is completely off the topic of evolution.
After you've decided without any evidence that there must have been an external cause, you are still no closer to knowing anything about it.
And it's really silly to say we are limited to the gods you mentioned. I could make up an infinite number of gods to meet those criteria if you gave me enough time.
Also... this is completely off the topic of evolution.
BS Liberal Arts progress - 105/120
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)