I don't know why I have to repeatedly breakdown everything for you and why you're putting words in my mouth. I never said the disproportionality was a sign of rampant racism. However, the name discrimination and racial profiling is a sign of racism. I know this sounds harsh, but you didn't even know the definition of underrepresentation or racial profiling. In the other thread, I had to correct your comprehension errors. You would even forget what you were talking about and what I was responding to even though I quoted you.
If you want to look at history, look at a time when the federal government ignored racism. We had Jim Crow laws. You are sort of contradicting yourself by saying that the government and media's drawing attention to the subject has increased it. Since more and more attention is being drawn to it, wouldn't that make racism more rampant? Racism has actually decreased after the Civil Rights Act. History does not back up your often incorrect assertions. We already know what you think of women's rights so there you go....... Do you have a problem with the federal government protecting veterans from discrimination? They need the extra protection because there is proof that they are more likely to be discriminated against than non-veterans. The same goes for other protected classes. There are a lot of things and people in life that warrant extra protection for various reasons outside of government laws on protected classes. It's not about favoritism, it's about acknowledging reality. If you know that the type of vehicle you own is more likely to be stolen, you are going to take extra precautions to protect it. It's not that you like that vehicle more than the other ones you own.
The people who are trying to make data fit their preconceived notions are the people who like your comments because you have been so obviously wrong and offensive so many times. Remember your implication that Catholics are polytheistic? There is absolutely no getting around the mistakes you've made. It's a purely objective measurement.
If you want to look at history, look at a time when the federal government ignored racism. We had Jim Crow laws. You are sort of contradicting yourself by saying that the government and media's drawing attention to the subject has increased it. Since more and more attention is being drawn to it, wouldn't that make racism more rampant? Racism has actually decreased after the Civil Rights Act. History does not back up your often incorrect assertions. We already know what you think of women's rights so there you go....... Do you have a problem with the federal government protecting veterans from discrimination? They need the extra protection because there is proof that they are more likely to be discriminated against than non-veterans. The same goes for other protected classes. There are a lot of things and people in life that warrant extra protection for various reasons outside of government laws on protected classes. It's not about favoritism, it's about acknowledging reality. If you know that the type of vehicle you own is more likely to be stolen, you are going to take extra precautions to protect it. It's not that you like that vehicle more than the other ones you own.
The people who are trying to make data fit their preconceived notions are the people who like your comments because you have been so obviously wrong and offensive so many times. Remember your implication that Catholics are polytheistic? There is absolutely no getting around the mistakes you've made. It's a purely objective measurement.
Graduate of Not VUL or ENEB
MS, MSS and Graduate Cert
AAS, AS, BA, and BS
CLEP
Intro Psych 70, US His I 64, Intro Soc 63, Intro Edu Psych 70, A&I Lit 64, Bio 68, Prin Man 69, Prin Mar 68
DSST
Life Dev Psych 62, Fund Coun 68, Intro Comp 469, Intro Astr 56, Env & Hum 70, HTYH 456, MIS 451, Prin Sup 453, HRM 62, Bus Eth 458
ALEKS
Int Alg, Coll Alg
TEEX
4 credits
TECEP
Fed Inc Tax, Sci of Nutr, Micro, Strat Man, Med Term, Pub Relations
CSU
Sys Analysis & Design, Programming, Cyber
SL
Intro to Comm, Microbio, Acc I
Uexcel
A&P
Davar
Macro, Intro to Fin, Man Acc
MS, MSS and Graduate Cert
AAS, AS, BA, and BS
CLEP
Intro Psych 70, US His I 64, Intro Soc 63, Intro Edu Psych 70, A&I Lit 64, Bio 68, Prin Man 69, Prin Mar 68
DSST
Life Dev Psych 62, Fund Coun 68, Intro Comp 469, Intro Astr 56, Env & Hum 70, HTYH 456, MIS 451, Prin Sup 453, HRM 62, Bus Eth 458
ALEKS
Int Alg, Coll Alg
TEEX
4 credits
TECEP
Fed Inc Tax, Sci of Nutr, Micro, Strat Man, Med Term, Pub Relations
CSU
Sys Analysis & Design, Programming, Cyber
SL
Intro to Comm, Microbio, Acc I
Uexcel
A&P
Davar
Macro, Intro to Fin, Man Acc