+- Online Degrees and CLEP and DSST Exam Prep Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb)
+-- Forum: Main Category (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-Main-Category)
+--- Forum: General Education-Related Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-General-Education-Related-Discussion)
+--- Thread: Ethical caution (/Thread-Ethical-caution)
Ethical caution - ShotoJuku - 06-23-2008
Greggy_D Wrote:Hey....I'm allowed. I WAS a Republican for over 20 years.
I guess that explains why Michigan is no longer considered a red or blue state but rather purple (just like EC)!!!
Ethical caution - studyhard - 06-23-2008
Greggy_D Wrote:Ethics do NOT exist out in the real working world.
Wow.
*shakes head in shock*
Quote:End result: NO...I do not favor censorship/editing of questions and answers on this forum by a forum member or Mod.
If ethics don't exist in the real world, it tickles me that you think it would be somehow wrong for someone to do something.
If IC determined it was in its best interest to moderate some things, how is that any different from you determining that it is in your best interest to ignore some of the restrictions that colleges impose? You're looking out for number one and they're looking out for number one. Why is it right for you, but wrong for them? If ethics don't exist, how can IC be "wrong" anyway? How could anything be wrong? hilarious
Ethical caution - Greggy_D - 06-23-2008
IC can do whatever the hell they want. It's their site. Never said it was "wrong" for them to censor/edit questions. I simply offered my opinion.
What bothers me is the blatant hypocrisy by the testing outfits and colleges themselves. You can get the answers/questions if you BUY their material. But DAMN YOU to evil Satan if you get it through other means. Ethical? No, not by any means especially since they pimp themselves as Institutions of Higher LEARNING. Not Institutions of HIGHER PROFITS.
Ethical caution - studyhard - 06-23-2008
Greggy_D Wrote:IC can do whatever the hell they want. It's their site. Never said it was "wrong" for them to censor/edit questions. I'm simply offered my opinion.
Yeah, but you offered your opinion that they shouldn't do it. Who's to say what someone should or shouldn't do if ethics only exist in a textbook?
*nibbles a chocolate bar mischievously* hilarious
Ethical caution - ShotoJuku - 06-23-2008
Greggy_D Wrote:But DAMN YOU to evil Satan if you get it through other means.
Forget the nazi's and GOP, now the prince of darkness is in the mix - this thread is really getting nasty!!! :eek:
Ethical caution - Greggy_D - 06-23-2008
Hey....I'm allowed. I served the Prince of Darkness......err I mean the GOP for over 20 years.
Ethical caution - ShotoJuku - 06-23-2008
Greggy_D Wrote:Hey....I'm allowed. I served the Prince of Darkness......err I mean the GOP for over 20 years.
Holy Crap Batman...ROFLMAO!!! hilarious
Ethical caution - bmills072200 - 06-23-2008
how about this for censorship...let's create a huge bonfire and throw this entire thread into the inferno!!!
Ethical caution - barcotta - 06-23-2008
bmills072200 Wrote:how about this for censorship...let's create a huge bonfire and throw this entire thread into the inferno!!!
Here, here! This thread only existed because one member wanted to remind everyone not to post actual questions from exams they've taken--but it turns out that many of the people/extremists that participated in this thread cannot tell the difference between reporting an actual question from an exam and the publication of a question in the flashcards or another test prep publication which is coincidentally also on an exam.
None of it matters anymore because when Steve Gloer posted, he made it clear that the exam makers are well aware of InstantCert (and assumably this forum) and if they see something they don't like, it looks like they'll let him know. Therefore, there's no longer any reason to speculate. Into the inferno!!
Ethical caution - barbara2bba - 06-23-2008
barcotta Wrote:Here, here! This thread only existed because one member wanted to remind everyone not to post actual questions from exams they've taken--but it turns out that many of the people/extremists that participated in this thread cannot tell the difference between reporting an actual question from an exam and the publication of a question in the flashcards or another test prep publication which is coincidentally also on an exam.
None of it matters anymore because when Steve Gloer posted, he made it clear that the exam makers are well aware of InstantCert (and assumably this forum) and if they see something they don't like, it looks like they'll let him know. Therefore, there's no longer any reason to speculate. Into the inferno!!
I've always been fond of voices of reason.