CIP Codes Warning - Printable Version +- Online Degrees and CLEP and DSST Exam Prep Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb) +-- Forum: Specific College Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-Specific-College-Discussion) +--- Forum: TESU - Thomas Edison State University Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-TESU-Thomas-Edison-State-University-Discussion) +--- Thread: CIP Codes Warning (/Thread-CIP-Codes-Warning) |
RE: CIP Codes Warning - Jonathan Whatley - 05-14-2024 Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. RE: CIP Codes Warning - sanantone - 05-14-2024 (05-14-2024, 06:29 PM)Jonathan Whatley Wrote: Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. GPT4 is still not 100% accurate, and AI chatbots hallucinate - meaning that they confidently give incorrect answers when they don't have the answer. You can even have different people ask the same question, and they'll get different answers from ChatGPT. Professors often talk about ChatGPT creating non-existent sources. One can actually go to USAJobs and look at the job announcements for operations research analysts. By the way, I also searched for "Classification of Instructional Programs" and received no results. RE: CIP Codes Warning - LevelUP - 05-14-2024 (05-14-2024, 06:29 PM)Jonathan Whatley Wrote: Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. I am currently writing a piece on the limitations of ChatGPT. For now, CIP codes are important enough of an issue to keep this thread pinned. RE: CIP Codes Warning - sanantone - 05-14-2024 (05-14-2024, 06:41 PM)LevelUP Wrote:(05-14-2024, 06:29 PM)Jonathan Whatley Wrote: Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. At least people will see that part of the post was misinformed. It's okay. No one is right 100% of the time. It's only a problem when people double down on their errors. RE: CIP Codes Warning - LevelUP - 05-14-2024 (05-14-2024, 06:45 PM)sanantone Wrote:(05-14-2024, 06:41 PM)LevelUP Wrote:(05-14-2024, 06:29 PM)Jonathan Whatley Wrote: Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. I never vouched for ChatGPT's statement; I merely presented its point of view. RE: CIP Codes Warning - Ares - 05-15-2024 (05-14-2024, 03:03 PM)sanantone Wrote: Ares, we're still waiting for evidence to support the OP's anecdote that you believed without question. Please quote where I said anything such thing. You seem to have reading comprehension problems which is strange because you list that you have four degrees. (05-14-2024, 06:01 PM)sanantone Wrote:(05-14-2024, 04:49 PM)LevelUP Wrote:(05-09-2024, 03:35 PM)sanantone Wrote: It's been almost a year, and no one has responded to you with any evidence for this claim. They haven't responded to you at all. You would have already failed my class by pretending that your anecdotes were facts. (05-14-2024, 06:45 PM)sanantone Wrote:(05-14-2024, 06:41 PM)LevelUP Wrote:(05-14-2024, 06:29 PM)Jonathan Whatley Wrote: Not for the first time, ChatGPT is blustering confidently while answering not the question asked but an unhelpfully different question no one asked. LMAO, you mean like when you kept repeating your anecdotes and then changed the subject to a strawman argument? RE: CIP Codes Warning - LevelUP - 05-15-2024 Ares' points are:
Sanantone's points are:
Data Science Series 1560. We could do without all the condescending comments. By the way, if I were a professor, I would give everyone, including myself, a ZERO for commenting on a thread that is 8 months old. RE: CIP Codes Warning - sanantone - 05-15-2024 (05-15-2024, 12:41 PM)Ares Wrote:(05-14-2024, 03:03 PM)sanantone Wrote: Ares, we're still waiting for evidence to support the OP's anecdote that you believed without question. I have seven college degrees, including a doctorate. I think the reading comprehension issues are on your end. The subject was not changed. I stated from the beginning that CIP code matching was not an issue for federal civilian hiring. I stated from the beginning that 24 credits is equivalent to a major. There was no subject change. I'm not using big words here. What are you missing? Looking at thousands of job ads over the period of many years is called sampling. It doesn't seem like too many here have looked at many USAJob announcements, so they're running with assumptions and what they want to believe. If they had looked at the job ads, they would be aware of OPM and the 24-credit requirement. Because I have looked at thousands of job ads, I was aware of something that you and others were not. You didn't even know where to go to find the answer. I found it for you. You're welcome. I don't know why anecdotes bother you so much when they were supported by an official government policy. You're arguing just to argue and because you're embarrassed. (05-15-2024, 01:18 PM)LevelUP Wrote: Ares' points are: Thank you for showing, once again, that CIP codes are not mentioned. There is nothing wrong with correcting misleading information no matter how old it is. It is a pinned thread, so it's kept at the forefront. What is the point of pinning a thread if you don't expect people to respond to it? RE: CIP Codes Warning - Ares - 05-16-2024 (05-15-2024, 01:38 PM)sanantone Wrote: I have seven college degrees, including a doctorate. I think the reading comprehension issues are on your end. The subject was not changed. That makes your reading comprehension problems even more embarrassing. You are correct on one thing, I am certainly bad at reading poorly formatted signatures like yours. You changed the subject away from your meaningless anecdotes. (05-15-2024, 01:38 PM)sanantone Wrote: Looking at thousands of job ads over the period of many years is called sampling. It doesn't seem like too many here have looked at many USAJob announcements, so they're running with assumptions and what they want to believe. If they had looked at the job ads, they would be aware of OPM and the 24-credit requirement. Because I have looked at thousands of job ads, I was aware of something that you and others were not. You didn't even know where to go to find the answer. I found it for you. You're welcome. ROFLMAO, you are not "sampling" job ads give me a break. USAJobs does not include the job requirements for every federal job nor does it include the internal procedures used by the hiring managers for any of those jobs. (05-15-2024, 01:38 PM)sanantone Wrote: I don't know why anecdotes bother you so much when they were supported by an official government policy. You're arguing just to argue and because you're embarrassed. No I am pointing out that your anecdotes are not facts. I suspect you are embarrassed that TESU does such a shoddy job with their CIP codes, regardless I think this thread is valuable for this reason alone. I noticed you failed to quote anything I stated. RE: CIP Codes Warning - sanantone - 05-16-2024 (05-16-2024, 04:40 AM)Ares Wrote:(05-15-2024, 01:38 PM)sanantone Wrote: I have seven college degrees, including a doctorate. I think the reading comprehension issues are on your end. The subject was not changed. You're bad at reading sarcasm. You have black and white thinking, and you take things too literally. There are anecdotes all throughout this forum. It must be giving you anxiety. Do you know what the definition of a fact is? It's either true or not true; it's either opinion or fact. An anecdote can be a fact because it actually happened. You're confusing facts with proof of generalizability. It has to be determined whether an anecdote can be generalized to other situations or the rest of the population. Since my anecdotes, which were facts for my situations, align with OPM policy, then it has been determined that my experiences can be generalized to other job announcements. OPM has the requirements for every job series. How about you go look at the website instead of looking crazy arguing about anecdotes that are supported by OPM. When you attend lectures and a professor gives you an anecdote to illustrate how a concept plays out, do you argue with that person? Insanity. Now, I'm wondering if you've even sat in a classroom to hear a lecture because every teacher uses anecdotes to further understanding of a fact or concept. I don't even know what to say to your excuse for not knowing what an MS degree is and your inability to count. I also did not say that all of my degrees were listed in my signature. Six of the seven are listed. You're so insecure about your low level of intelligence, you felt the need to defend yourself for not getting my degree count right. It was a non-issue. You're hilarious. Why would I be embarrassed about TESU's CIP code situation? I don't work there. What a nonsensical assumption. Where did you earn your degrees, if you have any? They should be embarrassed for awarding them to you. Hiring managers don't do the initial sifting. HR specialists determine eligibility and rankings. Then, they forward the applications to hiring managers. It's called a referral. You don't have a single clue what you're talking about. Federal government hiring is highly regulated. Agencies have to ask for permission to deviate from hiring rules. When they get permission, it has to be noted on the job announcement. For the low IQ individual who still doesn't understand that OPM regulates federal hiring. https://www.opm.gov/about-us/our-work/ |