03-15-2026, 05:07 PM
Welcome, Fr. Laurent! It is nice to hear information directly from the source.
The research output is, indeed, a strong argument for this school's legitimacy. Judging just from Google Scholar, it appears to be not world-shattering, but wholly adequate and even impressive for Euclid's actual relatively modest size. I am not aware of any degree mills with this kind of footprint; the number of papers with you as a second and third author suggests that you are, indeed, a rather active and effective faculty advisor. Well done. There are many clearly real schools with much more modest records in the world.
Let me make an obvious observation: here are two schools, Euclid and Euler-Frankener Memorial University. They are named after Euclid, arguably father of modern mathematics, author of a Geometry textbook that's in the "Great Books of the Western World" and is in constant use in education for 2000+ years; and after Johannes Euler, "Prince of Mathematicians", who have the distinction of being THE most productive math scholar IN HISTORY (by number of pages; Paul Erdos beats him by the number of individual papers). Yet none of them offers a Mathematics degree. What gives?
Good to know that you're back on US soil. I gather you now serve in the Serbian Archdiocese? As I am unexplicably following your career (after all, it's rare to see an interesting character in this field who's not an outright mill operator, like John Kersey), I was a little annoyed by you adopting a rather pretentious "de Kiev" postnominal while at the same time joining the Patriarchate of Moscow, by your own choice. I guess we'd have to agree to disagree on this.
My own assessment of Euclid stands. It's a real school, interesting to debate about, but too weird for most American students - at least if used for anything but personal interest studies. Good luck in your work!
(03-05-2026, 05:32 PM)cleenewerck Wrote: Greetings to all on the forum,All of this is good to know. Evan better would be seeing some independent evidence. Personally, I see no reason to doubt an Euclid degree would get a positive evaluation from at least one NACES member; receipts would lay this question to rest.
I rarely post here—I think my last message was many years ago and I had to create a new account. But since someone asked me to reply, I’m happy to provide updates and clarifications as of March 2026 (some interesting developments).
On EUCLID’s "US accreditation:" It is not and has never been a US institution... Therefore, it is not accredited by any CHEA-recognized US agency and does not claim to be (or need to be). EUCLID was not created to serve US students. We usually advise American applicants to explore US options first.
That said, we have enrolled several high-level US students, including a recent associate dean from a major university and the CEO of a major energy company.
(03-05-2026, 05:32 PM)cleenewerck Wrote: On UN status: EUCLID does not claim to be a United Nations body (obviously). See our clear statement here: https://www.euclid.int/un-status.aspThank you for the clarification. Euclid is not a UN body, and neither does it claim to be.
No one (except someone on this forum somehow) says that the UN “operates” EUCLID. It is an intergovernmental, treaty-based organization with a university mandate, recognized by the UN as such. As early as 2012, the UN treated such institutions as “accredited” due to their status. EUCLID holds intergovernmental observer status with the UNFCCC (COP) and is the only university with such status at the IPCC. We sent a head of delegation (with full intergovernmental observer credentials + an Oxford graduate and EUCLID professor) to the recent COP in Brazil. The Association of Caribbean States also granted us special “social actor” status after ministerial approval (we are currently doing a project with them).
(03-05-2026, 05:32 PM)cleenewerck Wrote: To clarify: I am not EUCLID’s founder. Prof. Touadéra established it as an extension of the University of Bangui (2005–2008). Governments later transformed it via intergovernmental agreements. My role came through dedication to its vision, some IT expertise, distance education experience, and international networking (and prayer). That drove its technological success 20 years ago. Today, I still serve as international faculty coordinator and oversight council chair. I focus on academic quality, faculty, and AI integration—while generating lots of reports for stakeholders and agencies.See, here I feel like you understate your role in starting this thing - especially in the early days of the EUCLID Consortium and the prominence of something called "HBTO" (which, to me, reads like basically your project) in it. On the other hand, reducing this project to just you is reductive in the other direction.
Our research output (e.g., on PubMed) speaks for itself.
The research output is, indeed, a strong argument for this school's legitimacy. Judging just from Google Scholar, it appears to be not world-shattering, but wholly adequate and even impressive for Euclid's actual relatively modest size. I am not aware of any degree mills with this kind of footprint; the number of papers with you as a second and third author suggests that you are, indeed, a rather active and effective faculty advisor. Well done. There are many clearly real schools with much more modest records in the world.
Let me make an obvious observation: here are two schools, Euclid and Euler-Frankener Memorial University. They are named after Euclid, arguably father of modern mathematics, author of a Geometry textbook that's in the "Great Books of the Western World" and is in constant use in education for 2000+ years; and after Johannes Euler, "Prince of Mathematicians", who have the distinction of being THE most productive math scholar IN HISTORY (by number of pages; Paul Erdos beats him by the number of individual papers). Yet none of them offers a Mathematics degree. What gives?
(03-05-2026, 05:32 PM)cleenewerck Wrote: The old “double-wide in California” rumor is absurd and was somehow mentioned... With California real estate prices, I almost wish it were true. (I am back in the US by the way (Idaho) and still serving in the Orthodox Church (almost 22 years as an Orthodox priest...))Since the "double-wide in California" post made a rather strong claim that you were, at the time, running Euclid by yourself, and that double-wide is somehow the bulk of its operations, I agree: it is strictly false.
Good to know that you're back on US soil. I gather you now serve in the Serbian Archdiocese? As I am unexplicably following your career (after all, it's rare to see an interesting character in this field who's not an outright mill operator, like John Kersey), I was a little annoyed by you adopting a rather pretentious "de Kiev" postnominal while at the same time joining the Patriarchate of Moscow, by your own choice. I guess we'd have to agree to disagree on this.
My own assessment of Euclid stands. It's a real school, interesting to debate about, but too weird for most American students - at least if used for anything but personal interest studies. Good luck in your work!


![[-]](https://degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)